As featured in
assets
Under Sarbati Devi v Usha Devi (1984) 1 SCC 424, the Supreme Court held that a nominee on a life insurance policy holds the proceeds in trust for the legal heirs of the deceased. The nominee is not the beneficiary — the nominee is a trustee.
This means: when the insurance proceeds are paid to the nominee, the nominee must distribute them to the legal heirs (as determined by intestate succession or by any valid Will).
The nominee's role is administrative — receive the proceeds and pass them on to the legal beneficiaries.
Section 39 of the Insurance Act 1938 provides for nomination on life insurance policies. It was amended in 2015 to provide additional protection for 'beneficial nominees'.
For 'beneficial nominees' (specific close family — parents, spouse, children, or a combination — nominated by the policyholder), the nominee receives the proceeds beneficially, not as a trustee. This overturns Sarbati Devi for these specific nominees.
For 'non-beneficial nominees' (anyone other than the specified close family), Sarbati Devi continues to apply — the nominee is a trustee for legal heirs.
The distinction is important: a policy naming a son (beneficial nominee) as nominee gives the son beneficial ownership. A policy naming a friend as nominee makes the friend a trustee for the legal heirs.
For non-beneficial nominees: the Will controls. The insurance proceeds go to the beneficiary named in the Will, regardless of who is named as nominee.
For beneficial nominees: the position is more complex. The 2015 amendment gives the beneficial nominee ownership, but courts have not definitively addressed whether a subsequent Will can redirect this. Best practice: assume the beneficial nominee gets the money unless clear evidence of contrary intent.
Practical implication: if you want your life insurance to go to a specific beneficiary, name that beneficiary both as the nominee on the policy and as the beneficiary in your Will. Consistent designations avoid disputes.
Assuming nomination is dispositive: 'my father named my mother as nominee, so mom gets everything.' This is wrong for non-beneficial nominees under Sarbati Devi.
Failing to update nominations: after marriage, birth of children, death of parent — update your nominations. Outdated nominations create disputes.
Naming a minor as nominee without a guardian direction: complicates payment process. Better to name an adult trusted person with directions to hold for the minor's benefit.
Multiple beneficial nominees without clear share allocation: creates disputes about proportions. Specify shares in the nomination form (Section 39 permits specifying proportions).
When a non-beneficial nominee receives insurance proceeds, they must distribute the proceeds to the legal heirs as would be determined under succession law (either intestate or per any valid Will).
Failure to distribute exposes the nominee to civil suits by legal heirs for recovery of their entitled shares.
Some legal heirs may consent to the nominee retaining the proceeds — this is valid provided consent is genuine and free.
For nominees who receive substantial proceeds and are not sure of their duties, consulting an advocate before distributing is prudent.
For each life insurance policy, decide:
Who should ultimately receive these proceeds?
Name that person (or a testamentary trust) as the nominee under Section 39.
Match this designation in your Will's specific bequests or in the residuary structure.
If your Will directs term-insurance proceeds into a testamentary trust for minor children, name the trust or trustee as the nominee. Do not name the minor child directly as nominee.
For substantial term-insurance policies (₹5+ crore), consider structural approaches to preserve the corpus rather than direct payout to family members who may not manage substantial sums well.
Most people have multiple life policies — term insurance, employer group insurance, whole life or endowment policies. Each has its own nomination.
Review all nominations annually. Ensure they reflect current family composition and current intentions.
If your Will has changed but nominations have not, disputes are likely on your death. Update nominations to match Wills.
When a life-insured person dies, the family claims from the insurer with: death certificate, policy documents, identity of the nominee, KYC of the nominee.
For beneficial nominees: payment goes directly to the nominee's bank account.
For non-beneficial nominees: payment still goes to the nominee, but the nominee then must distribute to legal heirs per Sarbati Devi.
Insurers process most claims within 30-60 days for straightforward cases. Disputed cases can extend to years.
Under Indian law, a life insurance nominee is not automatically the beneficial owner — the Sarbati Devi doctrine applies unless the nominee is a specified close family member under Section 39.
Coordinate your nominations with your Will. Inconsistency creates disputes and delays.
For substantial life insurance, consider whether a testamentary trust as beneficiary would preserve corpus better than a direct family payout.
This is general legal information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, consult a Law Tarazoo advocate.
Start with the ₹5,000 Online Will — advocate-reviewed, delivered in your inbox in 30 minutes. Or book a 60-minute Personalised consult at ₹25,000.
Start My Will →
