As featured in
The 2005 amendment to the Hindu Succession Act 1956 changed the status of Hindu daughters in ancestral property. NRI daughters, whether born before or after 2005, have coparcenary rights on equal footing with sons. Here is what this means and how to exercise the right.
Before 2005, only sons had a share by birth in Hindu Mitakshara joint-family (coparcenary) property. Daughters could inherit from their parents in specific ways but did not have birth-right ownership of ancestral property.
The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act 2005 changed section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act 1956, giving daughters the same status as sons: they are coparceners by birth in Hindu Mitakshara ancestral property, with the same rights and liabilities as sons.
This means: an ancestral property held by four generations of ancestors is jointly owned by the current coparceners (sons AND daughters born to any generation). Each has a right to demand partition. Each's share is their absolute property, transferable and inheritable.
A long-standing question after 2005 was whether the amendment applied retrospectively — i.e., did daughters born before 2005 (and daughters whose fathers had died before 2005) get the same rights?
The Supreme Court answered definitively in Vineeta Sharma v Rakesh Sharma (2020) 9 SCC 1: yes, the amendment applies retrospectively. Daughters are coparceners by birth regardless of when they were born. It does not matter if the father was alive on 9 September 2005 (the amendment date) or not.
This is a very significant clarification. It means: a daughter born in 1975 whose father died in 1990 is nonetheless a coparcener in ancestral property, and can seek her share now.
Being a Non-Resident Indian, an OCI cardholder, or a foreign citizen of Indian origin does not diminish these coparcenary rights. The Hindu Succession Act's provisions apply based on religion (Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh, Jain), not on residence or citizenship.
An NRI daughter in New Jersey has the same coparcenary right in her paternal ancestral property in Chennai as her brother who has always lived in Chennai. The right exists; the exercise of the right may need to be through an advocate acting on power of attorney.
Not all family property is ancestral. Ancestral property is specifically property that has descended from the paternal great-grandfather (i.e., property inherited through four generations of male ancestors).
Self-acquired property (bought or earned by the father in his lifetime) is NOT ancestral. The father can dispose of self-acquired property freely — by Will, by gift, by sale — without any coparcenary rights of his children.
Common confusion: family homes that everyone thinks are 'ancestral' are often actually self-acquired by the father (bought during his life), and therefore fully at his testamentary disposal. Only property he himself inherited from his father, which came from grandfather, which came from great-grandfather, is truly ancestral in the technical sense.
For an NRI daughter, one of the first steps in exercising rights is establishing which properties are ancestral versus self-acquired. This may require examining sale deeds, family records, and mutation entries.
Option 1: Amicable partition. All coparceners agree to divide the ancestral property, sign a partition deed, register it, and take physical or notional possession of their shares. This is by far the preferred approach — no litigation, minimal cost, family harmony preserved.
Option 2: Notional partition through settlement. Property remains jointly held but a family settlement agreement records each coparcener's share. Enforceable if a dispute later arises.
Option 3: Partition suit in court. If amicable partition is impossible (typically because some coparceners refuse to acknowledge others' rights), the coparcener seeking her share files a partition suit in the appropriate civil court. Timeline: 2-5 years typically, longer if contested.
For an NRI daughter, options 1 and 2 can be pursued from abroad through counsel. Option 3 requires an Indian advocate and, occasionally, in-person court appearances (though depositions can be through video conferencing in many cases).
NRI daughters often face specific practical hurdles:
Practical response: engage a Law Tarazoo advocate early. A demand letter, a formal notice under the Hindu Succession Act, or a preliminary partition suit filing often prompts resolution without full litigation.
A Hindu father can make a Will disposing of his own share of ancestral property (his coparcenary share) and all of his self-acquired property. He CANNOT dispose of the shares of other coparceners (including the daughter's share) through his Will.
So if the father Wills 'the entire ancestral property to my son', that Will is effective only as to the father's own share (say, 1/4 in a property where the mother, father, son, and daughter are the coparceners). The daughter's 1/4 share is her own and is not affected by the father's Will.
This is critical. Many NRI daughters see a Will that appears to exclude them and assume they have no recourse. That is wrong. The Will can only dispose of what the father owned — not what the daughter already owns as a birth-right coparcener.
Under the Hindu Succession Act as amended in 2005 and clarified by the Supreme Court in Vineeta Sharma, NRI daughters have full coparcenary rights in Hindu Mitakshara ancestral property. NRI status, foreign residence, and OCI status do not diminish these rights.
If you are an NRI daughter with paternal ancestral property, know your rights. If you suspect exclusion or under-recognition, get a legal opinion from a Law Tarazoo advocate. Timely action preserves your position; delay favours those who would exclude you.
This is general legal information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, consult a Law Tarazoo advocate.
Start with the ₹5,000 Online Will — advocate-reviewed, delivered in your inbox in 30 minutes. Or book a 60-minute Personalised consult at ₹25,000.
Start My Will →
